Tuesday, September 16, 2008

 

Gladiation: Palin versus Putin Chess Match

Nobody is (yet) asking for a Medvedev vs. McCain vs. Obama, and Putin vs. Palin vs. Biden chess mini-tournament. Or some similar tournament, even with earphones and coaching only on the American side. Maybe they should be. Take Go or some other strategic game instead of chess if you believe it more revealing of the capability of a candidate for the highest executive offices. I suspect that many Americans would be appalled by the lack of strategic skills. Who is both willing and able to protect America (nevermind the colonies and occupied territories)?  How will voters decide?


One major problem with democracy as practiced in the United States of America : no one knows whether candidates are the most able to do the job, or just to campaign. In other words, is the better snake-oil salesman the one who sells the most product that doesn't work, or the one who has the product that works but won't gip buyers who don't need it?

It is not at all clear that the American candidates are seeking office because they believe they are the most fit.  Are they? Do all of them think so? If so, one might evoke a Catch-22 (designation registered to Joseph Heller) wherein Palin, deeming herself qualified, demonstrates that she isn't. Would Palin be able to play better than Cheney in the Caucases? Or know better than to try? Would McCain have to delegate everything, or would he actually trust himself to make decisions?

I think American voters should consider the abilities of candidates vis-à-vis their counterparts in competing nations, to pick a winning team. That's what an election, a presidential-and-vice-presidential election, is about. The nation is picking the captain(s) of it's team.  I played a little after-school pick-up basketball. Folks who played knew who was who, and there weren't big surprises as to who would be the captains, and only some surprises and disappointments as to who would be their picks--in what order. It might be useful to think about the presidential election in that way.



Identificateurs Technorati : , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

 

Unleash the fox hounds, they may catch some hawks

The "collateral damage" of a recent assault in Afghanistan by coalition troops was reported to have cost the lives of dozens of women and children, cost confirmed by both Afghanistan, which subsequently fired two generals, and the UN. According to the Pentagon investigation, and corroborated by an "independent embedded journalist", the count was exaggerated; there were only seven civilian deaths. But the local doctor had made a video with his phone, showing tens of women and children under shrouds lifted as he passed. I don't think it is on YouTube and hope it won't be. The "independent embedded journalist" was Oliver North , reporting for Fox,
according to Times UK Online .

The only reference I can find to this revelation in the US media is at Firedoglake, well-frequented but not exactly MSM.

Is it possible that the Pentagon can't recognize a hawk (to be charitable) in Fox clothing?


Identificateurs Technorati : , , , , , , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?