Friday, August 25, 2006


Longevity in France

Jeanne Calment died at age 122 in 1997; she was the French woman who lived the longest to date, as far as we know.

On August 12, 2006, Camille Loiseau, "oldest living French person since March 2005", died at the age of 114 years and six months.

In 1950, France had only about 200 people aged 100 or more; today there are over 20,000! A hundred-fold increase in less than a lifetime! And a dozen people over age 110 (all women? the article does not say).

It seems that, in rich countries such as ours, those who survive infancy hit their peak of robustness (vitality?) at age seven, then start to "age". Apparently, mortality rate increases regularly from age 7 to 95. The rate of ageing, by which "increasing rate of mortality" is meant, slows from age 95 to 107, at which point rate of mortality reaches a plateau. [source: Jean-Marie Robine, director of research at the Inserm, in Le Figaro]

Marie-Simone Capony, age 112 years, is the new "oldest living French person", designated by the Inserm on Tuesday, August 22. Will she outlive Jeanne Calment? Not before 2016.

Tags: :

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Who Let the Genes Out?

It may not be front page news in all the press, but the Arkansas Democrat Gazette--Northwest Arkansas Edition, is reporting that
Arkansans affiliated with the rice industry are looking for answers in the wake of the U. S. Department of Agriculture’s announcement Friday that trace amounts of unapproved genetically engineered rice had been discovered in U. S. long-grain rice samples.

In their article "Industry pursuing how rice strayed", by Nancy Cole in their Wednesday (23 Aug 2006) edition, they cover the facts, background and outstanding questions, foremost of which is: what happened?
The highlight key figures on the importance of this crop to Arkansas, and the fact that such genetically engineered rice has never been desired by either major domestic customers (Anhaeser-Busch and Kellogg) nor export customers (Japan, Europe) which have now banned purchases of American long-grained rice until the situation is corrected. They did not note that the USDA had taken three weeks to make the announcement after receiving the confirmed test results from Bayer CropSciences.

Meanwhile, the New York Times reported on August 16th that " Grass Created in Lab Is Found in the Wild". This was a bentgrass, also developed to be resistant to the herbicide Roundup, known generically as glyphosate.

Other press includes

Tags: : : : : : : :

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Thursday, August 24, 2006



Nearly a month ago, I happened on to a generator of avatars-- an avatar-assistant. It presented one with a sequence of choices: gender, hair style, color, eyebrows, eye color, glasses, facial hair (I did the one for males), mouth, and so on, down to shoes and accessories (like tennis racket, dog, cat). I really liked it. I even tried to improve my German vocabulary by making my choices with the German labels (I didn't figure out how to switch to English until I was almost done, and had my German-English dictionary at hand). The result was the image herewith. I think it is quite "me".

If anyone who reads this knows where to find the avatar assistant that would have produced this image and given it a name like "1153987301_ddf0e114d7e102ab5b18df5517a04602.png" PLEASE tell me.

Tags: :

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Pipol, Female Pipol

It just happens that female pipol(0) and their ageing (or preservation) came up in a conversation I had recently. I'm in my fifties, and pay some attention to some women my age, give or take a few years. Not serious attention, but more than to other age groups: to maintain my points of reference and my ability to recognize members of this group, since I find it increasingly difficult to guess the age of anyone over about ten years old (it seemed so obvious when my kids were those ages). "Pipol" with publicly known ages are an obvious benchmark.

I was trying to make conversation with one of my daughters (an increasingly difficult task, as our interests diverge) a week or two ago. I brought up a "news" event involving a "magazine" she "reads"(1) : the paparazzi beach candids of Ségolène Royal, French politician and possible presidential candidate.

Did you happen to see the photos of Ségolène in a bikini? Pretty good shape for a woman her age, I'd say. Very well conserved. (2)
Yeah, I think I saw them at Marion's. But Claire Chazal's (3)not bad, either.
Sure, but they're not the same age. Claire Chazal is much younger, Ségolène is almost as old as I am.
Wrong, Dad. She's not that young anymore.
Well, she has been around for a while, maybe I just didn't realize how long.(4) But I'm not sure, I'll look it up on the Internet at home.


[Silence, for most of the rest of the drive.]

Wikipedia :

Ségolène Royal was born September 22, 1953.

Me :

Thanks. So everyone says she's 53, but she's not quite; she has another month to go. For sure, she takes better care of herself than I do; I didn't look that fine fifteen months ago, and I haven't given birth to four children (I've never even been pregnant). Next?


Claire Chazal was born December 1, 1956.

Me :

Aha! Over three years younger than Ségolène! Not that the difference between 49 and 52 (rounding down, or 50 and 53, rounding up) need be major. But still. I think I can claim I was sorta not totally wrong when I said she was "incomparably younger". Out of curiosity, how old is Condoleeza Rice?

Wikipedia :

She was born November 14, 1954.

Me :

Cool! . [1] . . [2] . . [3] . . [4] . Burma Shave!

"Pipol" is the phonetic French word for "People".

Why all the quotes around "magazine" and "reads"? The product in question,
Closer, is mostly rumours and paparazzi pics with TV schedules. And the website has one of the most dysfunctional features I've encountered: its video player "pause", "stop", and "mute" buttons don't work! It autoplays an obnoxious clip and the only way to make it go away is to mute the computer and wait for the clip to end! Or leave the site...

I did not pick up one of those magazines, I just had a glimpse of a photo when the TV news reported on the incident.

An attractive anchorwoman who has presented the evening news on the leading channel for years. She became a "pipol" fairly quickly, possibly when she was pregnant, unmarried, and the name of the father was the object of speculation in "pipol" press (tabloids).
4. She's been presenting the evening news since 1991, her son was born in 1995, when she was closing in on 40. I guess I judged her to be younger at the time, for no particular reason. Good make-up. And parlerpourneriendire agrees with my daughter:
j'ai pesté contre Claire Chazal qui a un corps de rêve alors que moi je suis toute boudinée dans mon 2 pièces Decathlon,
I'll have to look for her photos, too; time for a visit to the doctor's waiting room (my coiffeur doesn't have magazines, at least not that I've ever notice.)

Tags: : : : :

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Saturday, August 19, 2006



I encountered the notion of "microformats" yesterday, and looked more closely today. I'm not sure I really get it, but my first impression is that it is using the "profile" meta element in html4 to approximate a schema using nested lists. The even go a bit farther, specifying the "most appropriate" html block or construct (defining how the xslt should transform to xhtml, if that were the genertion process). In this way, xhtml documents can be interpreted (parsed?) as if they were xml; and applications that know what to look for in "class" properties.

Excerpt of their principleMy interpretation
Reuse the schema (names, objects, properties, values, types, hierarchies, constraints) as much as possible from pre-existing, established, well-supported standards by reference.Start from a schema/dtd
Use the most accurately precise semantic XHTML building block for each object etc. . . Otherwise use a generic structural element. Map its structural nature to an html element (what would the xslt produce?).
Use class names based on names from the original schema, unless the semantic XHTML building block precisely represents that part of the original schema.Copy the name of the element (xml) to the class attribute of the html tag.
Finally, if the format of the data according to the original schema is too long and/or not human-friendly, . . . use a special technique.Use a work-around for ugly data.


Tags: | | |

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Monday, August 14, 2006


Web 0.8

The day after I wrote the post below, I had the great good fortune to discover Stu Nicholls CSSPLaY: he has found several ways to do frames without frames and all kinds of other nifty CSS usage. So I feared I needed to mostly take back what I wrote (which is why I unpublished it for a while). After a little consideration, I wasn't entirely wrong: Internet Explorer doesn't get CSS the way other browsers do, but there is a way of restating to IE what it is you want, in CSS, in a way other browsers will ignore. In other words, browser-specific CSS for Microsoft, but you can merge it into your page, you don't have to test for the user agent and send css accordingly.

Another resource is at Frames without Frames, including an impressive interlocking tiling of panels--impossible with frames (or tables?).

The original post follows.

As talk and development of Web 2.0 (copyright O'Reilly) continues, I set myself the more modest goal of getting my Driven by DokuWiki layout to do what I want: frames without frames. If Web 2.0 is about pages that automatically adapt and update themselves as you use them, Web 1.0 was about fetching requested content, possibly from multiple sources, and presenting it according to instructions provided in a standard language: html with CSS. It seems we can't even count on up-todate browsers to execute standard presentation instructions.

In other words, I want it to have a layout with a lefthand sidebar to contain interactive elements (buttons, search box, links, etc.) and constant elements (logo, icons that are the same for every page) while a broader right-hand panel would contain the page-specific content (title, table of contents, text).
Page Title

Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah.

Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah.

The lefthand panel should be immobile (i.e. not scroll with content) whereas the page content could overflow beyond the bottom of the viewport and be navigible with a scrollbar. This could be achieved quite simply with frames. But, I've "understood" that frames are 3v!l. I set out to do it with css (and not with tables, either!).

The basic idea is that there are two boxes, one -- always!-- the full height of the viewport and about one sixth the width, the other of variable height (possibly greater than the viewport) and occupying the rest of the available width. So, I defined two "div" elements, just as I would have frames. The main difference is that frames would be retrieved separately but my page is delivered in one load.
  1. Positioning the two boxes with "float: left" on the first and "float: right" on the second worked fine with Firefox, but not with IE6. After much playing with widths and margins, I finally managed to get the two divs next to each other in both browsers, but IE6 insisted on placing multiple scrollbars even when only one div had the "overflow: auto" property and always scrolled the "fixed" panel with the mobile content.
  2. IE6 also would not extend the height of the lefthand panel to the full height of the viewport just because I said "height: 100%;". But it did so when I set "height: 582px; max-height: 582px; min-height: 582px;".
  3. I consulted various sources (many of which I had read before), particularly the Autistic Cuckoo article Relatively Absolute. My fears were confirmed; it is not just my imperfect mastery of CSS but
    Unfortunately Internet Explorer doesn't support fixed positioning. There are a number of more or less complicated ways to circumvent that, but fixed positioning isn't actually as useful as one may think. Sure, it's conceivable to have a menu in the left or right column that is always visible, but most users today expect everything on the page to move upwards when they scroll.
    Emphasis mine.

    So much for relying on standards to achieve simple, browser-independent layout. No wonder we see that
    1. Lots of sites use JavaScript to provide stable (immobile) menus.
    2. Lots and lots of sites let everything on the page move when they scroll.
    3. Flash is so poplular for providing consistent, cross-platform and browser-indepent content.

    Conclusion. My options seem to be:
    1. Frames-- probably a bigger departure from the DokuWiki templates than I wish to undertake (and maintain).
    2. Stick with the "position:fixed; height: 100%;" and forget about IE. Optionally, add a notice below the fixed-100%-high panel advising "If you can see this, you need a new browser because yours doesn't understand layout styles!"
    3. JavaScript menubars.
    4. Not table(s).
    5. Give up, and accept standard, scrolling pages.

    Tags: |

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Saturday, August 05, 2006


Canicular Aberration

The bad news: Technorati still finds no blogs which link to this one, ranking it 1,669,958.

The good news: The local amateur weather station is back on line (its comm was knocked out by a thunderstorm last week) so I can get confirmation that the weather has really cooled off a lot! Todays high has not yet (at 11 a.m.) reached the lows of last week's nights! And we finally have had some rain, although I suspect it hasn't soaked in very deep yet.

No rain from July 12th to 27th, then only less than a cm spread over a couple of days: immediate evaporation, especially given that the daytime temperatures were over 30°C.

The cooler nights are nice, much more restful. I suppose people in the tropics "learn" to sleep well without coolness (do they?), but it is a problem for us Northerners. Really: I read it in a newspaper! A few weeks ago, reporting on the heat wave across much of Europe, a journalist noted that in Austria they were particularly troubled by the "tropical nights"--those when the temperature doesn't go below 20°C. Personally, I'd make that "doesn't go below 20°C and stay there for, say, four hours or more so I can get some rest!" We had nights recently when the low was below 20°C, but only for a few minutes around 5:00 a.m. after it trended down from 30°C at midnight and before it started rising again. For four straight days, July 25-28, it never dropped below 20°C, and I was going crazy. It is now the middle of the canicular period (22 July to 22 August) and I consider wearing a sweater or jacket when I go out at mid-day! Probably should take advantage to do some yardwork.

Some summary stats: Criterion May June July
Summer days (Tmax >= 25°C) 8 21 31
Canicular days (Tmax >= 30°C) 0 7 23
Tropical nights (Tmin >= 20°C) 0 0 7


StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Friday, August 04, 2006


Vanity Projects

I spent a lot longer responding to that idiotic WSJ opinion than I should have; that happens when I get really annoyed, and fume and grind my teeth and go off on tangents, and wish I could just give the sucker a head-butt to the chest like Zidane, it would be worth the red card...Why do some things I read have that ability to tick me off? I think it is the arrogance of certain authors, little know-it-alls that spout such tripe one doubts that they could understand a rebuttal or acknowledge the error of their ways.

As I tried to figure out why this piece was written and published, I continued to think about what constitutes a "political vanity project", the opinion author's chosen qualifier for a European technical institute, or another Internet search tool. Is the author really hoping that she has constructed an argument for this (the conclusion)?
If European leaders really want to foster the next Google, they might consider cutting the high taxes and red tape that send students and entrepreneurs the world over running for the United States. Then again, that would make sense -- and wouldn't cost taxpayers a centime.

The author has offered no evidence that:
  1. students and entrepreneurs the world over [are] running for the United States
  2. that they are doing so because of high taxes and red tape
  3. that following this advice would foster the next [European] Google
  4. that following this advice--retaining or attracting information technology entrepreneurs--wouldn't cost taxpayers a centime.
The author has, however, asserted that:
  1. The French government's appetite for venturing into business knows no bounds.
  2. Championed by President Jacques Chirac, Quaero has received some €90 million in public funds. The idea? To rival -- peut-être topple -- Google. This is one battle in Mr. Chirac's war against what he calls the "omnipresence" of "Anglo-Saxon" culture on the Web.
  3. Quaero (Latin for "I search") is the latest in a string of French and European political vanity projects.
  4. Later this year, French citizens will get to see more of their hard-earned euros put to work when "France 24" goes live, broadcasting international news. You know, like Fox.
Lots of really tendentious stuff here!
  1. This is just plain silly. No comment.
  2. While noting that Quaero is a "controversial Franco-German plan to build a state-funded European search engine", the Financial Times does not omit that Quaero was launched this year with initial funding of €1.7bn ($2.2bn) to develop voice-based and picture-based search technologies. “[Quaero] is not just about ‘let’s beat Google’,” Mr Mohn [Christoph Mohn, the heir to the Bertelsmann media empire] said. “It’s ‘let’s build up a competitive internet industry’.” ... “It’s a little bit like Airbus Industries. I don’t think it requires consolidation [of Europe’s internet industry] but it needs co-ordination.”
  3. Sorry, what are the criteria for a "political vanity project" again? Was the euro currency with its European Central Bank one? Was invading Iraq?
  4. "like Fox"? Why Fox? A private channel dear to WSJ readers no doubt; not "like BBC World" , "like CNN" , "like Euronews", or -- why not-- "like Al Jazeera" while we're at it!
So what brought on this splendid piece of advice? I suppose that, other than reciting the "Europe needs to be friendlier to American business" mantra, the main motivation is to distract from AOL's cut-back of a quarter of its staff, coming in the wake of Yahoo!'s miserable second quarter results, and without giving serious mention of Lycos/Bertelmann's ambitions. Or was this opinion piece just a "journalistic vanity project"?

19 July: Yahoo! 2nd quarter profits divided by four.

20 July: Yahoo! collapses on Wall Street. New advertising platform delayed three months.

20 July: Yahoo! loses $9 billion of its value.

30 July: Mr Mohn, chief executive of Lycos Europe, said his online community and search company would introduce some products to the US market in the next 12 months but European internet companies were operating at a disadvantage to their US rivals.
Bertelsmann and Lycos Europe are members of the Quaero consortium, which includes Siemens, Deutsche Telekom, Thomson and France Telecom.

4 August: AOL reveals plans to cut 5,000 jobs. A day after unveiling a strategy aimed at boosting its online audience, internet group AOL told its 19,000 staff around the world that within six months 5,000 of them would no longer be on its payroll.

4 August: Wall Street Journal advises Quaero consortium financers to save their money, cut taxes instead.


StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Dear Anonymous at WSJ

WSJ: The French government's appetite for venturing into business knows no bounds. Its newest foray is an Internet search engine called Quaero.

What is the problem? Is it the name of the project? As if the American government doesn't fund research which leads to business!

The Bayh-Dole Act includes four basic tenets, according to Allen: Government-funded research is owned by the university where it is performed; any royalties from patents are shared with inventors; use of the research is focused in the United States; and the government can use the research without having to pay royalties.

Since the act came into effect, Allen said, between 1980 and 2001 university patents have increased tenfold; 2,200 new companies have been started to develop new technologies based on patented research; 260,000 jobs have been created and about $40 billion of the United States economy have come from university research results.(source

Or consider the MIT Technology Licensing Office analysis:
"The Bayh-Dole Act is working precisely as intended, developing the fruits of government-funded research for the benefit of society," she said. "Economic development through exploitation of intellectual property is now widely considered one of the major benefits of federally sponsored research.

"Only government can make, for dozens of years, the patient investment in basic science needed for scientific discoveries. Only then can private business afford to take the considerable risk of licensing the patented discoveries and investing millions of dollars more to develop the technology into a device or medicine that will bring great benefits to society. This process generates new jobs, new companies, sometimes new industries and new wealth. Government then gets back its share through taxing that wealth," while the public benefits not only from the returned taxes, but from the new products, new companies and new jobs that result, Ms. Nelsen said in an interview Monday.

WSJ: Online, there's already, designed to compete with Google Earth, and Gallica, inspired by Google's library-indexing project. Both are financed by the French state.

Gallica is a service of the French National Library (which has been financed by the French state for a long time). It is inspired at least as much by Project Gutemberg, to which it furnishes scans of its public property texts. Who finances the Library of Congress? Is it inspired by Google's library-indexing project? Are we really to believe that only the silly French "waste" taxpayers' money to provide Internet access to public information resources?

WSJ: Google doesn't get a penny from any government, nor is it -- as far as we can tell -- part of a nefarious plot to rid the world of French culture.

The founders of Google didn't have government research grants while they were at Stanford? Are you sure? Not a penny of support went in to the creation of their ranking algorithm?

WSJ: If you don't like those pesky English-language results, you can eliminate them with a click of the mouse.

I know; and I particularly like setting the Google interface language to "Elmer Fudd" (BTW, do they have to pay Warner for the rights?)

WSJ: If European leaders really want to foster the next Google, they might consider cutting the high taxes and red tape that send students and entrepreneurs the world over running for the United States. Then again, that would make sense -- and wouldn't cost taxpayers a centime.

Seriously? First you classify "the planned 'European Institute of Technology,' funded by Brussels and intended to rival the Massachusetts Institute of Technology" a "French and European political vanity project"; mightn't it slow the braindrain? Now you claim that more students staying in Europe (or coming from elsewhere) wouldn't cost taxpayers a centime? Cut taxes on student income so they can pay more for their education and still come out ahead, maybe? But before we consider the economics and whatever else "send students and entrepreneurs the world over running for the United States", let's check the claim that they do. The OECD uses "share of foreign-born with tertiary attainment" to measure migration of the highly educated. I've ranked the U.S.A. and selected core European countries in the following table. The main observations:
In summary, there is not much to support the thesis that among OECD countries France is failing to attract and retain students and the highly educated; what do taxes and red tape have to do with it?

Foreign-born persons with tertiary attainment
as a percentage of the total number of residents with tertiary education
Countryimmigrants from other OECD countriesemigrants to other OECD countriesimmigrants less emigrants within OECD zoneimmigrants from the rest of the worldnet totalExpenditure per student in tertiary education: 2002
U.S.A. 4.25 0.701 3.549 9.166 12.715 20 545
France 4.209 4.425 -0.217 8.168 7.951 9 276
Spain 2.745 2.284 0.462 3.784 4.245 8 020
Germany 2.827 7.334 -4.507 8.562 4.056 10 999
Belgium 5.937 6.441 -0.504 4.187 3.684 12 019
United Kingdom 6.491 14.856 -8.365 9.372 1.008 11 822
Denmark 4.45 7.333 -2.883 3.176 0.293 15 183
3.326 8.933 -5.607 4.369 -1.238
13 101
Ireland 14.002 26.133 -12.131 4.038 -8.093 9 809

WSJ [Implied] I'm not saying who wrote this. I'll let you believe it is the concensus opinion of the Wall Street Journal.

You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

Tags: | | | | |

Tertiary attainment for age group 25-64
Year: 2000 2001 2002 2003
U.S.A. 36.495 37.313 38.133 38.422
France 22.048 23.021 23.98 23.439
Spain 22.619 23.624 24.378 25.19
Germany 23.499 23.222 23.427 23.982
U. K. 25.671 26.097 26.861 27.989
Denmark 25.778 26.484 27.417 31.887
Ireland 21.838 23.661 25.398 26.308

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Thursday, August 03, 2006



In a sketch recorded many years ago, Steve Martin complains, "Those French have a different word for everything!" Why, I wondered, do they have the word "canicule" when English-speakers need two words ("heat" and "wave")? In this case they seem not only to have a different word, but to have a word missing from the reputedly abundant English language.

As it turns out, "canicule" did not originally mean "heat wave" per se. It names the canicular period, when Sirius (the dog star) rises and sets with the sun (or, according to Wikipedia, Sirius "rises after and sets before the sun, and hence is lost in the latter's glare"); this is the time of year which is typically hottest, from 22 July to 22 August.

Furthermore, some English dictionaries include "canicule", so it is not really missing (I was just ignorant). In common parlance, we refer to "dog days", the vulgarisation of caniculares dies.

However, if the time of year which is typically hottest falls earlier each year (we had a major heat wave in Europe in early July this year, but who knows what August will bring) it will have nothing to do with the dog star or constellation and perhaps should be given a new name.

Tags: | |

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Summer in the Municipality

I suppose I live in a town. It seems to meet the criteria offered by various online dictionaries:
So a town is a city that is too small to be a city. What does it take to qualify as a city?
A center of population, commerce, and culture; a town of significant size and importance.

We have population (more than I'd be able to feed), commerce (a couple hundred shops, and a public market twice a week), but is this a center of culture? Of course! We have schools (public and private, pre-school through high school, and a technical school), a mediathèque (a library with digital recordings, too, and Internet terminals), a nicely renovated theater, and annual musical festivals ("music and humor" in the spring, and folk music and dance from around the world in August). I should add mention of museums and occasional art exhibits. Places of worship, too!

Some recent sightings:

A former production facility has been converted to the Franco-Turkish Cultural Association.
Franco-Turkish Cultural Association

Air conditioned theater open 2:00 p.m. to

During the heat wave, the municipal theater served as a public shelter (for those who couldn't or wouldn't spend their afternoons in a supermarket)--translation: "!Heat wave! Air conditioned theater open to the public 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m."
A water fountain in the center of town flows with water that is drinkable!
Potable water

Tags: ||

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Wednesday, August 02, 2006


Look-alike White Pussies

Washing up the last pots and pans that had been soaking, starting to prepare dinner, I glanced out the kitchen window and caught the eye of ... a white cat. At first, I thought it was "mine", but went to check and "mine" was still curled sleeping on an armchair. I chatted it (the "imposter"), and it stayed put (maybe it has eaten here before?), I talked to it and tried to check it out; it is all white (as far as I could see) with pink skin, just like the resident. The resident awoke, came to the kitchen and hopped up on the window ledge, saw the "imposter", and lay down: not keen on chasing the "other" away, nor surprised enough for me to think he was surprised.

I took a "photo" with my phone. We see the back of "resident's" head in the foreground (bottom left) and a bit of "imposter's" face about four metres away around the corner of the house. After a moment, I gave him (resident) a light rub and he arose and came back into the kitchen.

A few minutes later, I saw the "imposter" scamper off the skeletal remains of a balcony, roll on the ground on the "lawn" (in damper times), playing in the yard with one of the plastic Bocci balls I keep to play with cats. Then he arose, clawed a plank, rubbed a shrub, and finally climbed up the fence and onto the neighbors' wall.

I am perplexed. I don't know how much to worry about this situation. My cat (the resident) is not a fighter (although he does come home with scratches and with holes in the fur under his chin) because he has as little testosterone as a steer (much, much less than Floyd Landis should have had because he has several fewer testicles than Landis), but I don't know about the "imposter". Hence I do not know the nature of the conflict (macho versus eunuch, or hungry eunuch versus younger affluent eunuch, or just older eunuch versus younger eunuch, or even if "imposter" is significantly older).

Resident went out, to hunt but also I suppose to defend his home (promenade) and range. After a while, the other cat and he exchanged noises; I went out and the other fled, resident came out of a tree to rub against me and to be reassured. But quickly returned to the "frey".

I've closed the basement window, but the cat door (also in the laundry room) remains functional.

A few minutes ago (10-ish), I heard a cat "land" in the kitchen: it looked white at first glance, reflected in the shiny black cupboard doors. When I called to it (with the noises one makes to a cat) it hopped up and out; before it disappeared, I saw it had colored spots on its back, which I really don't think the earlier "fake" resident cat had. I suspect it to be a cat that has come here before (I don't know how often), one I remember seeing late in the evening in April just before Mandou vanished.

What to do. "Resident" is out of the house; I must leave him at least one entry (the cat door in the laundry room) and leave my bedroom door open--both so that he can come to me if he comes in pursued, and so that I can hear if other intruders make an unusual ruckus in the house.

I hope I still have a healthy white pussy tomorrow; I'll reflect on how to deal with a second one should it seek domicile. Fortunately for me, "resident" has a handicapped tail following an accident a few months ago, so I can tell that a white cat with pink nose and yellow eyes is not him if it lifts or otherwise moves its tail.

P.S. Monday's mouse corpse.

Tags: , , , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?